<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Chicago Child Custody Lawyer</title>
	<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog</link>
	<description>Chicago Child Custody Lawyers and Attourneys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Step one: Begin gathering financial documents</title>
		<description>You're not going to have to do any calculations now, but you'll need certain
financial documents in the future to evaluate your assets and understand the
financial position you're in. Just the task of gathering papers helps push you
out of lethargy. And it doesn't require any critical thinking — something that's
so hard ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=121</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>1 After Filing</title>
		<description>	
1 After Filing
Personal Financial Management Instruction </description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=120</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Appropriate Forum</title>
		<description>   Other Country
Italy qualified as the proper forum to assume jurisdiction because it was “in the best interest of the child,” since both of the child’s parents had a significant connection with Italy and there was available in Italy substantial evidence concerning the child’s housing, support, education, medical and dental care ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=119</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Custodial Parent Found in Contempt</title>
		<description>Custodial parent who removed children from Illinois to Louisiana and obtained a Louisiana court order that prohibited visitation by the other parent the day prior to a scheduled visitation was properly found in contempt of the Illinois visitation order because the Louisiana order did not excuse the custodial parent’s noncompliance ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=118</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Petition to Vacate Judgment Section 2-1301</title>
		<description> IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH
 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS

JESSICA FAN,                    )
                Plaintiff,                )
                                               )
v.                                            )   No. 2002 LM  2222
                                               )
CONNIE W,                          )
                Defendant.            )

       AMENDED PETITION TO VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER
 SECTION 2-1301

Petitioner, CONNIE W, by and through her attorneys, states:

     1.  Petitioner is the Defendant and Respondent is the ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=117</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Award Proper</title>
		<description>Where the parties made a contribution of marital property in order to purchase a marital asset, namely, a pension, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding the wife appropriate share at dissolution.
An employee’s widower was entitled to an annuity where it was admitted that the employee and ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=116</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Issues In Maraital Property</title>
		<description>Bank Accounts
 Where the trial court erred in classifying wife’s savings plan as marital property, on remand, the trial court was to include the savings in wife’s non-marital estate, and the marital estate was to be reimbursed for the contributions made to the savings plan after the date of marriage.  In ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=115</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Child Support Determinations</title>
		<description>Where the agreement states a percentage of income as support, the trial court should apply subdivision (a)(3) to determine the net income, and then state the child support as a dollar amount. In re Sheetz.
 Former husband who paid in excess of specific sum set forth in settlement agreement who, at ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=114</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Modification of Support</title>
		<description>Defendant’s credit card payments represented current obligations owed in conjunction with the same marital dissolution in which modification of support payments was being sought; they were not “prior” within the meaning of subdivision (a)(3)(g), and therefore not deductible, as they were not obligations to a “family that is first in ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=113</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Disposition of Property</title>
		<description> Under normal circumstances, a court does not have jurisdiction to dispose of property in a proceeding for legal separation except where property is submitted for disposition by agreement of the parties.  In re Lipkin
 Circuit court had jurisdiction to adjudicate property interests of parties to a proceeding for legal separation under ...</description>
		<link>http://chicago-child-custody-lawyer.com/blog/?p=112</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
