Header image
Dedicated To Children
D. Siegel, Esq.
19 S Lasalle Street
Suite 707
Chicago IL 60603
Phone773-276-6868

Chicago Child Custody Lawyer

July 28, 2007

Preliminary Injunction Cases

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidmsiegel @ 12:16 pm

Evidence held sufficient to uphold a preliminary injunction based upon the enforceability of the restrictive covenants in an employment contract. Lee/O’Keefe Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Ferega.
 The injunction ordered by the trial court against operation of a dog kennel as a public nuisance was not overbroad nor, under the evidence, too drastic where the county zoning board permitted up to three dogs at each residence. People ex rel. Traiteur v. Abbott.
 Permanent injunctions may not be entered without a trial on the merits where defendant is not in default, since the judgment of the injunction quoted in the notice of appeal indicated a permanent injunction and since plaintiff requested immediate entry of such injunction, the court had to assume, where no other contrary indications existed, that the court entered a permanent injunction. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Foremost Sales Promotions, Inc.
 Where allegations of fact in the unanswered verified complaint and the accompanying affidavit of appellees were factually sufficient to justify the issuance of the temporary injunction without notice and without bond, the Appellate court did not abuse its discretion in granting the injunction. Ortscheid v. Siegman.
 An interlocutory injunction must stand or fall on the pleadings as they existed at the time the order was entered. Schaefer v. Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co.

July 6, 2007

Marital Asset

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidmsiegel @ 10:15 am

July 5, 2007

Findings To Wife

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidmsiegel @ 8:59 am

July 2, 2007

Presumption of Gift Rebutted

Filed under: Uncategorized — davidmsiegel @ 9:22 am

Powered by WordPress